<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 ECAC Availability Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Puglisi</title>
		<link>http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>John Puglisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I have not received an availablility request from ECAC yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not received an availablility request from ECAC yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Soskis</title>
		<link>http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Soskis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>John, I have gotten thru to AW on this issue. I also had questions about when,when, when. He claims that ECAC is in a state of flux. What is causing this, I am not sure. ECAC has been late in this area year after year. I would suggest that we all accept other assignments and stick with them. Perhaps ECAC will learn a lesson if they cannot talk us into turning back the games we already accepted, even if they are lower level games....Bob Soskis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I have gotten thru to AW on this issue. I also had questions about when,when, when. He claims that ECAC is in a state of flux. What is causing this, I am not sure. ECAC has been late in this area year after year. I would suggest that we all accept other assignments and stick with them. Perhaps ECAC will learn a lesson if they cannot talk us into turning back the games we already accepted, even if they are lower level games&#8230;.Bob Soskis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Crean</title>
		<link>http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>John Crean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nymisoa.com/blog/2007/05/02/2007-ecac-availability-update/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>FYI... I read the 'News" message (5/2/07) concerning Alan Wharton and ECAC 2007 availability and I followed-up with a friendly reminder to Alan on 5/9 with my e-mail contacts; I did not receive a reply as yet from Alan and I am concerned about history repeating itself, that is, fortuitously I was not included in his 2006 ECAC assigning;  Please advise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI&#8230; I read the &#8216;News&#8221; message (5/2/07) concerning Alan Wharton and ECAC 2007 availability and I followed-up with a friendly reminder to Alan on 5/9 with my e-mail contacts; I did not receive a reply as yet from Alan and I am concerned about history repeating itself, that is, fortuitously I was not included in his 2006 ECAC assigning;  Please advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
